ArticleHealth science reports2025
Clinical Implementation and Validation of the Arabic Face-Q Rhinoplasty Module.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Implementation and Validation of the Arabic Face-Q Rhinoplasty Module.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The Face-Q is a patient-reported outcomes instrument with 43 independent scales; its rhinoplasty module measures patient satisfaction with nasal appearance and adverse effects following aesthetic rhinoplasty. However, no validated Arabic version exists for Middle Eastern populations. This study aimed to validate and culturally adapt the Arabic FACE-Q rhinoplasty module following COSMIN guidelines. Methods: A prospective validation study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, between November 2019 and March 2020. Fifty Arabic-speaking patients (mean age 30.3 ± 6.8 years; 54% male) undergoing primary rhinoplasty completed the Arabic FACE-Q preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. We assessed structural validity (confirmatory factor analysis), convergent validity (Average Variance Extracted), discriminant validity (Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio), internal consistency (Cronbach's Results: The three-factor structure was confirmed with acceptable fit (CFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.910, RMSEA = 0.081, SRMR = 0.087). The Arabic module demonstrated strong internal consistency ( Conclusion: The Arabic FACE-Q rhinoplasty module demonstrates good structural validity, excellent reliability, and exceptional responsiveness to surgical change. Despite ceiling effects limiting detection of further improvements, the instrument is suitable for clinical and research use in Arabic-speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.