ArticleBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2025
Article in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of body mass index on outcomes after radical cystectomy: A retrospective Australian cohort study.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- CT-to-PET Synthesis in the Head-Neck and Thoracic Region via Conditional 3D Latent Diffusion Modeling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Standardized care pathway reshaped the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of urinary bladder cancer. A 15-year population-based study.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Synergy of PET and MR imaging in the local and regional staging of bladder cancer.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer has a poor prognosis. Accurate lymph node (LN) staging is crucial, yet conventional imaging demonstrates limited sensitivity for detecting metastasis, necessitating improved pre-operative assessment. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 138 patients who underwent RC and pelvic LN dissection (PLND) at a multisite tertiary institution from 2008 to 2021. All patients received either pre-operative CT or FDG-PET/CT within 8 weeks before RC and PLND. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for detecting LN metastasis (LNM) were calculated using pathological analysis as the reference standard. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were employed to assess overall survival (OS). Results: FDG-PET/CT exhibited higher sensitivity (70% Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT provides superior sensitivity and PPV compared to CT for LN staging in BC, facilitating more accurate pre-operative evaluation. The improved prognostic stratification associated with FDG-PET/CT may guide individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.