Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324056›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Combining Optical Coherence Tomography and Fractional Flow Reserve for Decision Making in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the FUSION Study.

Rick H J A Volleberg, Doosup Shin, Richard A Shlofmitz, Aziz Maksoud, Bassem Chehab, Kanitha Phalakornkule, Jana Buccola, Nutte Tarn Teraphongphom, Ajay Gopinath, Ashley Netravali and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rick H J A VollebergDepartment of Cardiology, St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York.
Doosup ShinDepartment of Cardiology, St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York.
Richard A ShlofmitzDepartment of Cardiology, St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York.
Aziz MaksoudCardiovascular Research Institute of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas.
Bassem ChehabCardiovascular Research Institute of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas.
Kanitha PhalakornkuleAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California.
Jana BuccolaAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California.
Nutte Tarn TeraphongphomAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California.
Ajay GopinathAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California.
Ashley NetravaliAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California.
Ziad A AliDepartment of Cardiology, St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York.
Allen JeremiasDepartment of Cardiology, St Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physiological indices and intracoronary imaging provide additional and complementary information to coronary angiography, which may enhance procedural decision making during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) on revascularization decision making and PCI strategy compared with angiography guidance alone. Methods: In this secondary analysis from the prospective, observational FUSION (Validation of OCT-Based Functional Diagnosis of Coronary Stenosis) study, the impact of angiography, OCT, and FFR on procedural decision making was evaluated by comparing the intended treatment strategy after each step to the actual treatment strategy, which was left to the operator's discretion and was guided by the totality of diagnostic testing. Results: Among 224 patients (mean age, 67.4 ± 9.2 years; 30.8% women), 116 (51.8%) underwent coronary revascularization, while it was deferred in 108 (48.2%). Compared with the actual treatment strategy, the rate of intended revascularization was significantly higher when guided by angiography (62.5% vs 51.8%; Conclusions: Fractional flow reserve and OCT provide distinct yet complementary information that significantly impacts decision making during PCI. Specifically, FFR informs revascularization decision making, while OCT plays a crucial role in device sizing. Combining anatomical, morphological, and physiological variables in a single modality may enhance decision making and reduce resource utilization.

Indexed as

clinical decision makingfractional flow reserveoptical coherence tomographypercutaneous coronary interventionrevascularization

Identifiers

PMID41324056
PMCPMC12664641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.