Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324050›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Perforation Treated With Covered Stents: The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance in a Contemporary Cohort.

Omar Sami Abdelhai, Ahmad Jabri, Sant Kumar, Ahmed Ghoneem, David Gelovani, Adnan Halboni, Mohammad Memon, John Major, Parsa Kamalipour, Ismail Jiazuldin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Omar Sami AbdelhaiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Ahmad JabriDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Sant KumarDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Ahmed GhoneemDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
David GelovaniDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Adnan HalboniDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Mohammad MemonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
John MajorDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Parsa KamalipourDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Ismail JiazuldinDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Brittany FullerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Brian O'NeillDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Herbert D AronowDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Mir Babar BasirDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
William W O'NeillDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Mohammad AlqarqazDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention carries significant morbidity and mortality; however, data are limited regarding the specific role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in evaluating and guiding management after CAP occurs and whether this approach improves clinical outcomes. Methods: This study consisted of a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and experienced CAP treated with covered stents at a single tertiary care hospital between December 2014 and January 2024. The primary outcome was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary outcomes included mortality, myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, and emergency cardiac surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between IVUS and outcomes. Results: Between 2014 and January 2024, 127 cases of CAP treated using covered stents were identified. Of these, 34 patients (26.8%) underwent IVUS-guided covered stent optimization, whereas 93 patients (73.2%) did not undergo IVUS. Patients in the IVUS group were older (75.1 ± 8.4 vs 61.0 ± 10.3 years; Conclusions: The use of IVUS in patients requiring covered stents for CAP treatment, despite higher procedural complexity and a higher prevalence of severe perforations, was associated with significantly reduced TVR. This suggests a potential role for IVUS in improving clinical outcomes following CAP.

Indexed as

coronary artery perforationcovered stentsintravascular ultrasoundpercutaneous coronary interventiontarget vessel revascularization

Identifiers

PMID41324050
PMCPMC12664623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.