ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Procedural Utility, Reliability, and Success of Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease Utilizing Transradial Access.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radial to Peripheral Intervention: A Paradigm Shift.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transradial access (TRA) in coronary interventions is widely recognized for its reduced complication rates and improved patient outcomes. Its application in peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) is limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent PVI via TRA between November 2021 and November 2024 at a single center. The primary outcome was procedural success. Results: A total of 137 patients (median age, 70 years; 51% men) with 213 lesions were included; smoking (94.2%) and hypertension (93.4%) were the most common comorbidities. Chronic total occlusions were present in 36.4% of cases. Access was predominantly obtained via the left radial artery (83.9%); the right radial artery was used in 7.2% of cases. Bilateral interventions were performed in 21.8% of cases. The success rate was 98.5%, with a 2.1% rate of periprocedural complications. TRA facilitated early ambulation (30-120 minutes) and a 96.5% same-day discharge rate. Conclusions: TRA appears to be a viable alternative to femoral or brachial access for PVI, demonstrating reduced complication rates and enhanced patient outcomes and satisfaction in this series. A few tools are needed to perfect and facilitate this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.