ReviewFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Autogenous dentin for socket preservation: a narrative review of clinical outcomes compared to spontaneous healing.
Review in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socket preservation after tooth extraction is a critical procedure to maintain alveolar ridge dimensions for future prosthetic rehabilitation. Autogenous dentin has emerged as a promising graft material due to its biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and similarity in composition to bone. A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in January 2025 using a defined MeSH-based strategy. The search was limited to human clinical studies published in the past ten years. Only studies directly comparing groups with autogenous dentin grafts and spontaneous healing without augmentation were included. Six studies met the criteria and were included in the final review, all confirming the safety and biocompatibility of autogenous dentin. Histological evaluations showed active bone formation around dentin particles and high osteoblastic activity without inflammatory response. Cone beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) analysis, performed in most studies, revealed significantly better preservation of ridge dimensions in autogenous dentin matrix (ADM)-augmented sites, especially in the coronal third of the socket. One study highlighted successful outcomes even in periodontally compromised molar extractions. Despite the general agreement among studies, further research (ideally with standardized protocols) is needed to confirm long-term efficacy in diverse clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.