ReviewDialogues in health2025
Coping strategies and resilient behavior among frontline healthcare workers: A scoping review.
Review in Dialogues in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with suicidal ideation in healthcare personnel: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Coping Strategies Among Psychiatric Nurses in a Mental Health Setting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Strategic Planning Perception as a Mediator Between Psychological Resilience and Coping Strategies Among Nursing Staff: Implications for Workforce Resilience.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review aimed to examine coping strategies and resilient behaviours for stress management among frontline healthcare workers as per the Sustainable Development Goal 3 (Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all). Five major databases (APA PsychInfo, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception until December 2024, including peer-reviewed articles and the first three hundred results on Google Scholar. The review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The inclusion criteria were experimental and observational studies examining coping strategies and stress management interventions for frontline healthcare workers in any healthcare setting. Non-empirical studies, those without a clear methodology, and non-English-language studies were excluded. Data screening and selection were conducted using Rayyan software by two independent teams, with disagreements resolved through consensus with a third reviewer. Data extraction captured the study characteristics, population demographics, settings, and key findings. The cumulative sample size across all studies was 33,889 healthcare professionals, with significant gender disparity favouring female participants. This study spanned thirty countries across multiple continents, with the United States contributing the largest subset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.