Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324017›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Preprocedural screening for multidrug-resistant organisms in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an international, multicentre, cross-sectional observational study.

Koen van der Ploeg, Margreet C Vos, Hardik Rughwani, Juliëtte A Severin, Richard A J Post, D Nageshwar Reddy, Sadhana Yelamanchili Veturi, Mitnala Sasikala, Sana Fathima Memon, Alessandro Repici and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gut colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms in hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal illness: A single-centre, cross-sectional study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Koen van der PloegDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Margreet C VosDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hardik RughwaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Juliëtte A SeverinDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Richard A J PostDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
D Nageshwar ReddyDepartment of Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Sadhana Yelamanchili VeturiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Mitnala SasikalaDepartment of Translational Research, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Sana Fathima MemonDepartment of Gastroenterology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Alessandro RepiciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Marco SpadacciniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Matteo ColomboDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Marta AndreozziDepartment of Endoscopy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
Bryan A StevensDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rohit DasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adam SlivkaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bibi C G C Mason-SlingerlandDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco J BrunoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) carries a risk of patient-to-patient transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) via contaminated duodenoscopes. Data on preprocedural MDRO carriage are limited and essential for guiding targeted prevention strategies, including the potential use of single-use duodenoscopes. This study assessed MDRO carriage among patients undergoing ERCP across four countries. Methods: In this international, multicentre, cross-sectional observational study, adults undergoing ERCP in tertiary care centres in the Netherlands, India, Italy, and the United States were screened for MDROs using preprocedural rectal and throat-nose swabs. Consecutive adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing ERCP, regardless of indication, were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included cases in which ERCP was not performed, a duodenoscope was not used, or the rectal swab was not collected. MDROs screened included extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Findings: Between Jan 22, 2022, and Oct 09, 2024, 1244 patients were enrolled, of whom 798 (64.1%) were male and 446 (35.9%) were female. Among all participants, 462 (37.1%, 95% CI 34.5-39.9) carried an MDRO. Prevalence was highest in India (290/349, 83.1%, 78.8-86.7) and lowest in the Netherlands (37/343, 10.8%, 7.9-14.5), with intermediate rates in Italy (66/209, 31.5%, 25.7-38.2) and the United States (69/343, 20.1%, 16.2-24.7). MDRO species and resistance mechanisms varied by country. ESBL-E were most prevalent in India (245/349, 70.2%, 65.2-74.8) compared with Italy (42/209, 20.1%, 15.2-26.0), the Netherlands (35/343, 10.2%, 7.4-13.9), and the United States (15/343, 4.4%, 2.7-7.1) (p < 0.001). CPE were detected in 82/349 (23.5%, 19.4-28.2) patients in India but were uncommon in Italy (8/209, 3.8%, 1.9-7.4), rare in the United States (3/343, 0.9%, 0.3-2.5), and nearly absent in the Netherlands (1/343, 0.3%, 0.0-1.6) (p < 0.001). CPPA was only detected in 1/349 (0.3%, 0-1.6) patient in India, with none in the other centres (p = 0.46). Resistant Acb-complex was only detected in 1/209 (0.5%, 0-2.7) patient in Italy (p = 0.18). VRE was most frequent in the United States (37/343, 10.8%, 7.9-14.5), followed by Italy (20/209, 9.6%, 6.3-14.3) and India (26/349, 7.4%, 5.1-10.7), and was not detected in the Netherlands (p < 0.001). MRSA was detected primarily in the United States (27/343, 7.9%, 5.5-11.2), with lower prevalence in Italy (6/209, 2.9%, 1.3-6.1), India (5/349, 1.4%, 0.6-3.3), and the Netherlands (1/343, 0.3%, 0.0-1.6) (p < 0.001). Significant risk factors for MDRO carriage included country of inclusion, with higher odds observed in India (aOR 99.14, 95% CI: 48.21-203.86, p < 0.001) and Italy (aOR 6.58, 95% CI: 3.57-12.14, p < 0.001) compared with the Netherlands (reference), while the association for the United States was not statistically significant (aOR 1.61, 95% CI: 0.82-3.14, p = 0.17). Other significant risk factors were chronic lung disease (aOR 1.75, 95% CI:1.07-2.86, p = 0.025), congestive heart failure (aOR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.33-3.64, p = 0.002), and prior use of penicillins (aOR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.05-2.63, p = 0.031). Interpretation: This study shows global heterogeneity in MDRO carriage among patients undergoing ERCP, reflecting underlying differences in antimicrobial resistance, healthcare infrastructure, and infection control practices. Strategies to prevent endoscope-associated transmission should therefore be tailored to local resistance patterns rather than adopting a universal approach. Preprocedural screening and targeted infection prevention strategies should be integrated within broader, region-specific infection control frameworks. The study's limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings, including restriction to tertiary care centres, incomplete enrolment data, and inter-site variability in patient characteristics and microbiological methods, which may affect generalisability. Nevertheless, the results provide a robust foundation for developing targeted, evidence-based interventions and for future research evaluating the clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of preprocedural screening and infection prevention policies across diverse healthcare settings. Funding: Boston Scientific International and Copan Italia SpA.

Indexed as

Cross infectionEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyGastrointestinal endoscopesHealthcare associated infectionsMicrobial drug resistance

Identifiers

PMID41324017
PMCPMC12661358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.