ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
A head-to-head comparison of sextant-systematic biopsy vs. extended-systematic biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy: SEXTANT-PRO non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06684652 (Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Targeted Biopsy Plus Sextant Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Targeted Biopsy Plus Sextant Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Smarter, Not More: The Rationale for Reducing Systematic Cores in the MRI-Targeted Biopsy Era.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, combined MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) and 12-core extended systematic biopsy (SB) (TB + 12SB) has been recommended for biopsy-naïve patients with MRI-visible lesions for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. However, extended biopsy increases complication burden and healthcare expenditure. This head-to-head RCT aims to compare the novel combined MRI-TB and sextant six-core SB (TB + 6SB) scheme and classical TB + 12SB for PCa diagnosis. Methods: From December 2024 to June 2025, this single-center non-inferiority RCT (NCT06684652) consecutively enrolled 506 biopsy-naïve men with single suspicious lesion on prostate mpMRI. Patients were randomized to undergo TB + 12SB (n = 252) or TB + 6SB (n = 254) through transperineal cognitive fusion technique. The study outcome included clinically significant PCa [csPCa, grade group (GG) ≥2, primary outcome], diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, and health economic profiles. Findings: The baseline characteristics were similar. The csPCa detection rate of TB + 6SB [54.3%, 138/254] was non-inferior to that of TB + 12SB [54.8%, (138/252)] [rate difference and 95% confidence interval: -0.5% (-9.2%, 8.3%)]. Comparable detection was also observed in PCa, high-grade PCa, and clinically insignificant PCa. The concordance in GG between biopsy and radical prostatectomy whole-mount specimens was similar for both TB + 12SB [52.3% (34/65), κ = 0.55] and TB + 6SB [51.7% (30/58), κ = 0.50] groups (p = 0.25). TB + 6SB demonstrated superior safety profiles through significantly relieving the discomfort during the procedure, reducing the post-biopsy pelvic pain, and significantly improving the quality of life (p < 0.05), while concurrently optimizing procedural workflow efficiency and histopathology resource utilization. Interpretation: TB + 6SB achieves non-inferior diagnostic efficacy to classical TB + 12SB with reduced cores and improved safety, positioning it as an effective strategy for PCa diagnosis in biopsy-naïve patients with solitary MRI-suspicious lesions. Funding: Beijing Research Ward Excellence Program (BRWEP2024W054070105), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Interdepartmental Research Project of Peking University First Hospital, 2023IR27, 2024IR16).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.