ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
The personalized approach to rituximab treatment in membranous nephropathy: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03804359 (Personalized Medicine for Membranous Nephropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Medicine for Membranous Nephropathy
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of proteinuria for the administration of rituximab in patients with PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy: a single-centre retrospective analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Early-Stage B-cells Predict Relapse After Rituximab Treatment in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Contemporary review of primary membranous nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Membranous nephropathy is a renal autoimmune disease associated with autoantibodies against phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) in 50-80% of cases. Patients develop immunity towards a single or multiple PLA2R1 domains, defining a cascade immunization or epitope spreading associated with worse prognosis and low rate of spontaneous remission. We aimed to compare the efficacy of standard versus personalized treatment (based on biomarker: epitope spreading) with the immunosuppressor rituximab on remission rate at month-12. Methods: A randomized, prospective clinical trial (NCT03804359) was conducted in 12 French hospitals. Enrollment between November 2019 and October 2022. Follow-up lasted two years after inclusion and ended in October 2024. Sixty-four patients with PLA2R1-associated membranous nephropathy were randomly assigned (1:1) to the GEMRITUX protocol (symptomatic treatment for six months followed by two 375 mg/m Findings: Thirty-one patients (48%) were randomized to the GEMRITUX arm and 33 (52%) to the personalized arm. In the GEMRITUX arm, four patients were treated with NIAT only since they entered into spontaneous remission at month-6, while 24 patients received low dose rituximab at month-6. In the personalized arm stratified according to their epitope spreading status, non-spreaders (n = 16) received NIAT for six months, while spreaders (n = 17) were immediately treated with high-dose rituximab. At month-12, the clinical remission rate was higher in the personalized group (67% versus 35%, p = 0.01), associated with improved kidney function (p = 0.0498 for estimated glomerular filtration rate). There was no difference in the rate of spontaneous remission nor in the number of adverse events between both groups suggesting that patients in the personalized arm were not over-treated. Interpretation: Personalized treatment protocol based on PLA2R1 epitope spreading status is superior to the standard GEMRITUX protocol in achieving clinical remission at month-12 by stratifying the patients according to the immunological severity of the disease and by immediately treating the patients at risk of treatment failure with rituximab. Funding: DGOS, PHRC National 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.