Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324008›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

The personalized approach to rituximab treatment in membranous nephropathy: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Vesna Brglez, Maxime Teisseyre, Kévin Zorzi, Céline Fernandez, Marion Cremoni, Thomas Crepin, Antoine Lanot, Victor Gueutin, Etienne Novel-Catin, Claire Rigothier and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03804359 (Personalized Medicine for Membranous Nephropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03804359 phase2completednot on this map

Personalized Medicine for Membranous Nephropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceRan2020 to 2024Enrolled68ConditionsIdiopathic Membranous NephropathyArmsRituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Vesna BrglezCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Nice, France.
Maxime TeisseyreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Nice, France.
Kévin ZorziCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Nice, France.
Céline FernandezCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Nice, France.
Marion CremoniCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Nice, France.
Thomas CrepinService de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
Antoine LanotNormandie Univ, Unicaen, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, Néphrologie, Caen, France.
Victor GueutinService de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Côte de Nacre, Caen, France.
Etienne Novel-CatinService de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France.
Claire RigothierService de Néphrologie Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Caroline PelletierService de Néphrologie - HTA - Dialyse, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Bertrand KnebelmannService de Néphrologie-Dialyse Adultes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Dominique ChauveauDépartement de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'organes, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rénales Rares, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM U1297, Toulouse, France.
Vincent AudardService de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Centre de Référence Maladie Rare « Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique », Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.
Jean-Michel HalimiService de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
David VerhelstService de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier d'Avignon, Avignon, France.
Stéphane CambiaggioDélégation de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Kevin LegueultDépartement de Santé Publique, UR2CA, Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Laurent BaillyDépartement de Santé Publique, UR2CA, Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Gérard LambeauCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Inserm, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Sophia Antipolis, Université Côte d'Azur (UniCa), Valbonne Sophia Antipolis, France.
Vincent EsnaultDépartement de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, France.
Olivier MoranneService de Néphrologie Dialyse Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Barbara Seitz-PolskiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Membranous nephropathy is a renal autoimmune disease associated with autoantibodies against phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) in 50-80% of cases. Patients develop immunity towards a single or multiple PLA2R1 domains, defining a cascade immunization or epitope spreading associated with worse prognosis and low rate of spontaneous remission. We aimed to compare the efficacy of standard versus personalized treatment (based on biomarker: epitope spreading) with the immunosuppressor rituximab on remission rate at month-12. Methods: A randomized, prospective clinical trial (NCT03804359) was conducted in 12 French hospitals. Enrollment between November 2019 and October 2022. Follow-up lasted two years after inclusion and ended in October 2024. Sixty-four patients with PLA2R1-associated membranous nephropathy were randomly assigned (1:1) to the GEMRITUX protocol (symptomatic treatment for six months followed by two 375 mg/m Findings: Thirty-one patients (48%) were randomized to the GEMRITUX arm and 33 (52%) to the personalized arm. In the GEMRITUX arm, four patients were treated with NIAT only since they entered into spontaneous remission at month-6, while 24 patients received low dose rituximab at month-6. In the personalized arm stratified according to their epitope spreading status, non-spreaders (n = 16) received NIAT for six months, while spreaders (n = 17) were immediately treated with high-dose rituximab. At month-12, the clinical remission rate was higher in the personalized group (67% versus 35%, p = 0.01), associated with improved kidney function (p = 0.0498 for estimated glomerular filtration rate). There was no difference in the rate of spontaneous remission nor in the number of adverse events between both groups suggesting that patients in the personalized arm were not over-treated. Interpretation: Personalized treatment protocol based on PLA2R1 epitope spreading status is superior to the standard GEMRITUX protocol in achieving clinical remission at month-12 by stratifying the patients according to the immunological severity of the disease and by immediately treating the patients at risk of treatment failure with rituximab. Funding: DGOS, PHRC National 2017.

Indexed as

Clinical trialEpitope spreadingMembranous nephropathyPersonalized treatmentRituximab

Identifiers

PMID41324008
PMCPMC12664402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.