ArticleBJUI compass2025
Flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm lower pole renal stones: Protocol for an international, multicentre, randomized non-inferiority trial (FLAME trial).
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07159035 (Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Stones), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Stones: an International, Multicenter, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial (FLAME Trial)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower pole renal stones measuring 1-2 cm remain challenging to treat. While mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) provides high stone-free rates (SFRs), it carries tract-related morbidity. Flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) is less invasive but limited in SFR. The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) has shown promise in improving stone evacuation and intrarenal pressure control. We hypothesize that FANS f-URS is non-inferior to mini-PCNL for patients with 1-2 cm lower pole stones in SFR. Study Design: The FLAME trial is an international, multicentre, randomized, non-inferiority study directly comparing FANS-f-URS with mini-PCNL in this setting. Endpoints: The primary outcome is immediate SFR within 72 hours on low-dose CT. Secondary outcomes include SFR at 1 month, operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, complications (Clavien-Dindo) and quality-of-life changes. Patients and Methods: A total of 640 adults with CT-confirmed 1-2 cm lower pole renal stones will be randomized 1:1 to undergo FANS-f-URS or mini-PCNL across 20 high-volume urology centres worldwide. Randomization is centralized and stratified by site. Radiologists and statisticians will remain blinded to allocation. Sample size was calculated assuming an 85% SFR for both arms, an 8.5% non-inferiority margin, 80% power and 15% attrition. Analyses will follow both intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07159035.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.