ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Diagnostic superiority of serial increase in C-reactive protein versus single measurement in differentiating bacterial from non-bacterial etiologies in pediatric patients.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnostic value of a single C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement in distinguishing bacterial from non-bacterial infections is limited. CRP velocity (CRPv), a dynamic metric derived from sequential CRP measurements, has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in adults. Aims: To evaluate the association between CRPv in the first 24 hours of presentation and bacterial etiologies in pediatric patients with initial CRP level < 31.9 mg/L on presentation to the pediatric emergency department (PED). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients under 18 years of age who presented to our emergency department from 2018 through 2021. Each patient had two CRP measurements within a 24-hour period. CRPv was computed as the difference between the first (CRP1) and second (CRP2) CRP values divided by the time interval between measurements. Bacterial infections were determined based on discharge diagnoses, including positive cultures or clinical/radiological evidence. Results: Of 307 patients with initial CRP1 ≤ 31.9 mg/L, 103 (33.5%) were diagnosed with bacterial infections. Patients with bacterial infections had significantly higher CRP1, CRP2, and CRPv values. CRPv showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) and was the strongest independent predictor of bacterial infection, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 6.0, Conclusions: CRPv provides superior diagnostic accuracy compared to single CRP measurements in identifying bacterial infections in pediatric patients with low initial CRP levels, suggesting its potential for enhancing early detection and guiding treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.