ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025
Psychometric Analysis of an Adapted Patient Care Ownership Scale for Medical Students.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patient care ownership (PCO) is a commitment to patient care with important implications for both patients and providers, and understanding PCO among trainees is an emerging area of study. Recently, Djulbegovic et al adapted a psychological ownership scale for graduate medical education (GME). Tailoring this scale for undergraduate medical education (UME) would strengthen the ability to measure and promote PCO among students, while directly linking this growth to the transition to GME. Method: Djulbegovic et al.'s PCO scale was adjusted through content expert input and cognitive interviews. This scale was administered to post-clerkship students at the University of Colorado School of Medicine after academic years 2020-21 and 2021-22. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to examine the underlying themes of the adapted scale in the 2020-21 sample. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed in the 2021-22 sample to evaluate factors elucidated in EFA. Messick's validity framework was used to guide collection of content, response process, and internal structure validity evidence. Results: The final scale included 16, 7-point Likert-style items. EFA modeling in the first sample suggested either a four-factor structure or a two-factor structure that was a simplification of the four-factor structure. CFA modeling in the second sample supported a four-factor model of PCO in medical students, named Advocacy, Decision-making, Opportunity, and Responsibility. Conclusions: This PCO scale demonstrated strong internal structure validity evidence and identified four factors contributing to PCO in medical students. Comparing these to Djulbegovic's work elucidates differences between UME and GME learners' experiences of PCO, chiefly in the opportunity of care ownership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.