Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323900›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Exploring cross-modal perception in a virtual classroom: the effect of visual stimuli on auditory selective attention.

Carolin Breuer, Lukas Jonathan Vollmer, Larissa Leist, Stephan Fremerey, Alexander Raake, Maria Klatte, Janina Fels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carolin Breuer *Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Lukas Jonathan Vollmer *Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Larissa LeistCognitive and Developmental Psychology, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Stephan FremereyAudiovisual Technology Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Alexander RaakeAudiovisual Technology Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Maria KlatteCognitive and Developmental Psychology, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Janina FelsInstitute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In virtual reality research, distinguishing between auditory and visual influences on perception has become increasingly challenging. To study auditory selective attention in more close-to-real-life settings, an auditory task was adapted to a virtual classroom. The new environment suggested evidence of increased attention, possibly introduced by the visual representation, gamification effects, and immersion. This could engage participants more effectively. To delve deeper into the impact of cross-modal effects, the paradigm was extended by visual stimuli. Participants were initially tasked with directing their auditory attention to a cued spatial position and categorizing animal names played from that position while ignoring distracting sounds. Animal pictures introduced in Experiment 1 were either congruent or incongruent with the auditory target stimuli, thus either supporting or competing with the auditory information. The concurrent presentation of animal pictures with the animal names increased response times compared to the auditory condition, and incongruent visual stimuli increased response times more than congruent ones. Fewer errors were made with congruent compared to incongruent pictures, and error rates of the auditory condition fell in between. When the visual stimulus was presented 750 ms or 500 ms before the auditory stimuli in Experiment 2, auditory and visual congruence effects interacted. In the 500 ms case, visually congruent stimuli decreased error rates in auditory incongruent trials. Conversely, visually incongruent stimuli decreased error rates on auditory incongruent trials at 750 ms. This reversal of effects suggests a positive priming effect at 500 ms and a semantic inhibition of return effect at 750 ms. Taken together, these findings indicate that cross-modal priming is at least partially different from multisensory integration.

Indexed as

attention switchingaudio-visual attentionauditory selective attentionbinaural hearingvirtual realityvisual priming

Identifiers

PMID41323900
PMCPMC12660268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.