Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323897›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Adolescent emotional responses to different music arrangements.

Yaming Wei, Huijuan Wu, Qianqi Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaming WeiResearch Center for Arts and health, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Huijuan WuSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Qianqi FanMusic (Music Therapy), Sookmyung Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate adolescents' positive emotional responses to different music arrangements, focusing on the influence of gender, music preference, and personal musical experience on emotional responses. The hypothesis proposes that gender and musical experience have a significant impact on adolescents' emotional responses to music. Methods: The study recruited 120 adolescents who listened to three different arrangements of the same song. Emotional responses were assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), alongside physiological measures including electrodermal activity (EDA) and heart rate variability (HRV). Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation analysis, were employed to evaluate the effects of gender, music preference, and personal musical experience on emotional responses. Results: Female participants showed higher PANAS scores for certain music arrangements. Music education or artistic training had no significant effect. Music preference was negatively correlated with emotional responses, while listening experience had a significant positive impact. Physiologically, the rock version (B) elicited the highest EDA, the classical version (A) showed the highest HRV, and the bossa nova version (C) yielded moderate responses in both measures. Conclusion: Gender and personal music preferences play important roles in adolescents' emotional responses to musical arrangements. These findings hold potential applications in music therapy, education, and psychological health interventions for adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescent emotionsemotional responsegender differencesmusic arrangementmusic preferencepositive and negative affect schedule

Identifiers

PMID41323897
PMCPMC12659694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.