ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Thermographic assessment of upper body muscles in climbers as a methodology for comparing different skill levels.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infrared thermography (IRT) is increasingly used in sports science to monitor muscle temperature changes in athletes. This study aimed to analyze muscle groups of upper body regions warming in climbers, comparing high (HL) and very high-level (VHL) climbers after completing a maximum-difficulty route. Methods: HL and VHL climbers performed their most challenging route, with thermographic measurements of muscle groups of upper body regions (biceps, elbow flexors, external and internal regions of the forearm, front shoulder, and triceps) taken before, immediately after, and 15 min post-climbing using IRT. Results: Climbing-specific muscles, such as the biceps, elbow flexors, and forearm regions, warmed significantly immediately after and after climbing. In contrast, secondary muscles regions, like the shoulder and triceps, exhibited minimal changes, indicating their supportive role. Non-specific muscle regions, such as the chest, back, and lower back, exhibited a cooling-rewarming cycle, highlighting their stabilizing role during climbing and contrasting with the greater heat generation of climbing-specific muscle regions. Advanced climbers showed less warming in specific areas-left biceps, right elbow flexor, and forearm-suggesting a more efficient thermoregulatory or metabolic response. This may indicate adaptations associated with advanced climbing performance. An optimized methodology for thermographic studies in climbing should include measurements immediately post-climbing and 15 min later to capture the immediate and ongoing muscle response. Conclusions: These findings suggest that specific muscles involved in climbing sustain significant temperature increases, with advanced climbers potentially benefiting from enhanced efficiency in muscle thermoregulation, which may contribute to improved performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.