Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323849›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections2025

Screening for stowaway exotic arthropods imported into Europe via aircraft: A cross-sectional analysis.

Nadja Hedrich, Michèle Bandoly, Juliane K Fischer, Patricia Schlagenhauf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Airport malaria at Frankfurt airport: once again!New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadja HedrichUniversity of Zurich, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michèle BandolyUmweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany.
Juliane K FischerUmweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany.
Patricia SchlagenhaufWHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, Department of Global and Public Health, MilMedBiol Competence Centre, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: International air mobility is increasing. With a changing climate in Europe, and the associated expansion of regions suitable for exotic vector habitats including mosquitoes, it is crucial to investigate possible routes for their transport over long distances. This study investigated whether exotic vectors are introduced to Europe via air traffic. Methods: At Zürich Airport, passenger cabins of selected aircraft were vacuumed after passengers had disembarked. The samples were examined microscopically, the findings identified, and the arthropod species morphologically determined. The take-off airports were selected based on the occurrence of exotic mosquitoes of interest. Results: A total of 37 aircraft were sampled between 2021 and 2023. No mosquitoes were detected in any of the samples. However, 12 flights, one third of all flights screened, showed the presence of different arthropods. These included beetles ( Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the risk of mosquitoes being introduced into the passenger cabin of an airplane is low. However, the survival of mosquitoes introduced from tropical regions is favoured by warming climatic conditions in Europe. We suggest that further studies using traps at airports and in aircraft cargo holds are warranted. Constant surveillance and random sampling of aircraft for arthropods, particularly at high volume hubs, are recommended.

Indexed as

AircraftAirportsArthropodsEpidemiological monitoringMosquitoesTravel

Identifiers

PMID41323849
PMCPMC12664423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.