Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323730›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2025

Subjective, intersubjective, and objective social statuses: How do people imagine social inequality?

Naoki Sudo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Naoki SudoGraduate School of Social Sciences, Hitotsubashi University, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi-shi, Tokyo, 186-8601, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that although subjective social status is related to objective social status, these statuses do not necessarily coincide with each other. Consequently, the relationship between subjective social status and social inequality had not been sufficiently explored. Accordingly, this study explored how and why they are related to each other by introducing the new concept of intersubjective social status. To measure subjective and intersubjective social statuses, I analyzed data from the Stratification and Social Psychology Survey in 2022 (SSP2022) and an online survey experiment by using ordered and multi-level ordered logistic regression models. The analysis revealed that although subjective and intersubjective social statuses share basic features, they are not the same concept. Subjective social status emphasizes the social inequality of opportunities, whereas intersubjective social status emphasizes the social inequality of outcomes. Additionally, the results revealed that the association between subjective and intersubjective (or objective) social statuses might vary depending on social status groups.

Indexed as

Intersubjective social statusObjective social statusSocial inequality of opportunitiesSocial inequality of outcomesSubjective social status

Identifiers

PMID41323730
PMCPMC12664347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.