ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025
Multiple organ scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the intensive care unit.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multicenter machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: development and external validation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A Simple Admission-Based Score for Early Mortality Risk Stratification in Non-Shock Sepsis: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) score, Acute Physiology Score III (APS III), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) in order to provide a more scientifically rigorous and effective tool for predicting mortality risk among sepsis patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: The demographic information and sepsis-related data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database for patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of sepsis. The predictive performance of CCI, LODS, APS III, SAPS II, and SOFA scoring systems in terms of ICU mortality was evaluated by comparing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multivariate regression identified predictors, later validated with a nomogram. Finally, the dataset was divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3 to assess the clinical utility of the prediction model through ROC curves. Results: The study enrolled a total of 17,226 patients with a median age of 67.65 (55.79, 78.82) years; among them, males accounted for 57.69%. Within this cohort, a total of 1,115 (6.47%) individuals succumbed during their admission to the ICU. The ROC curve demonstrated that both APS III and LODS score exhibited robust predictive value for ICU mortality. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that CCI, APS III score, LODS score, respiratory rate, body temperature, and race served as potential predictors. Combining these variables into a nomogram showed strong clinical utility, with AUCs of 0.803 (training set) and 0.797 (validation set). Conclusions: Organ failure scores hold significant clinical relevance in predicting mortality among sepsis patients in the ICU. Augmenting predictive accuracy can be achieved by integrating the CCI, APS III score, LODS score, mean respiratory rate, and body temperature during the initial 24 h following ICU admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.