ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
From security to spending: how China's long-term care insurance pilot drives urban household consumption.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As China confronts rapid population ageing and rising demand for older people's care, the establishment of a comprehensive long-term care insurance system has become an important institutional innovation. This study explores whether and how the implementation of the long-term care insurance pilot policy affects urban household consumption, a key component of domestic demand. Methods: This study employs a Difference-in-Differences approach based on panel data from 232 prefecture-level and above cities in China between 2011 and 2018 to identify the causal effect of the long-term care insurance pilot. The analysis further investigates the underlying mechanisms, including the expansion of public healthcare services, the enhancement of urban innovation capacity, and the improvement of wage levels. It also examines heterogeneity across different city types and spatial spillover effects. Results: Empirical evidence suggests that the implementation of the long-term care insurance pilot has a statistically significant positive impact on urban residents' consumption, increasing it by 7.35 per cent, equivalent to approximately 206.14 yuan. This effect is primarily driven by the reduction in informal care burdens, the rise in labour market participation, improved accessibility of medical services, and the enhanced application of technology in the care industry. The impact is more pronounced in cities with net population inflows and broader pilot coverage. Specifically, the introduction of the long-term care insurance raises urban residents' consumption by 8.22 per cent and 8.44 per cent in these cities, corresponding to 240.82 yuan and 236.68 yuan respectively, whereas such effects are not evident in cities with population outflows or narrower pilot coverage. Furthermore, the policy exhibits a notable spatial spillover effect, increasing the consumption levels of neighbouring non-pilot cities by up to 9.86 per cent, approximately 275.16 yuan. Discussion: These findings highlight the economic significance of long-term care system reform. Beyond meeting the care needs of an ageing population, the long-term care insurance pilot serves as a policy tool to stimulate consumption, promote employment, and narrow regional disparities. The spatial spillover effects suggest that scaling up the program may generate broader regional benefits, providing valuable insights for the further development of China's care system and social security reform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.