Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323608›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Understanding perinatal vulnerabilities: how Aboriginal women's cultural strengths and resilience shapes their social and emotional wellbeing.

Patricia Ratajczak, Tracy Reibel, Ailsa Munns, Roz Walker, Rhonda Marriott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia RatajczakNgangk Yira Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Tracy ReibelNgangk Yira Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Ailsa MunnsNgangk Yira Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Roz WalkerNgangk Yira Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Rhonda MarriottNgangk Yira Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During pregnancy, childbirth and postnatally, women are at their most vulnerable, requiring health and social care systems able to meet their needs. In the context of perinatal care, assessing Aboriginal women's mental health requires consideration of their whole-of-life to establish their overall social and emotional wellbeing. This requires mechanisms which respect women's cultural positioning and needs. In the Australian health care system, Aboriginal women's mental health is routinely viewed through mainstream screening and assessment tools, such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale which does not address cultural strengths or the protective nature of being connected to culture. In the face of significant structural inequities, including in perinatal care, Aboriginal women are frequently marginalized which contributes to their disengagement from services. Despite this, women's resilience remains evident and understanding why may hold the key to better perinatal care planning. As such, the aim of this study was to explore Aboriginal women's resilience, self-efficacy and empowerment during their perinatal experiences, assessing factors contributing to their cultural strengths when addressing perinatal mental health concerns. Methods: situated in a larger pilot implementation project, this qualitative study used an Aboriginal Participatory Action Research method and was undertaken on Whadjuk Country, Boorloo (Perth Western Australia). Aboriginal women ( Results: Six themes were identified from analysis of the qualitative data: (1) strengthening identity-reconnecting to Culture; (2) connection to kinship/family sub-theme, strong partner support; (3) connection to country; (4) connection to culture; (5) resilience and self-efficacy; and (6) women's experiences using the Baby Coming You Ready program's digital platform. Themes 1-5 clearly demonstrated women's strengths and resilience which were reported as a direct result of their culture and cultural connections; while theme 6 reported their positive experiences of using a strengths-based and culturally developed perinatal assessment platform. Conclusion: The results of this study confirm the positive benefits and value of co-designing tools for use in clinical settings which incorporate the cultural determinants of health and holistic perspectives of social and emotional wellbeing when screening Aboriginal women's perinatal mental health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPerinatal CareResilience, PsychologicalVulnerable PopulationsAdultAustraliaEmpowermentFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyQualitative ResearchSelf EfficacyWestern AustraliaAboriginal womenculturally safe carecultural strengthsdigital innovation (DI)perinatal screeningresilience in parentssocial and emotional wellbeing (SEWB)

Identifiers

PMID41323608
PMCPMC12659655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.