Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323515›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025

Machine Learning-Based Survival Analysis for Patients Receiving Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Chien-Hung Lu, Ching-Wen Chang, San-Chi Chen, Wei-Yu Kao, Wei-Yi Ting, Chia-Hsun Lu, Kai-I Chuang, Cheng-Fu Ni, Yao-Yu Hsieh, Ming-Shun Wu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chien-Hung Lu *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ching-Wen Chang *Graduate Institute of Metabolism and Obesity Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
San-Chi ChenDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Yu KaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Yi TingDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chia-Hsun LuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kai-I ChuangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8020-7970
Cheng-Fu NiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yao-Yu HsiehDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ming-Shun WuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Wei SuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Chao ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Horng WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lenvatinib is an effective treatment for patients with intermediate- to advanced-stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, tumor response and survival outcomes vary widely. Traditional machine learning (ML) models have been developed to predict treatment response or survival status at discrete time points. However, an overall prediction of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) incorporating censored survival data is lacking. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive survival analysis of OS and PFS by using ML-based survival models. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with unresectable HCC receiving lenvatinib across five healthcare centers. Demographic data, laboratory results, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes were collected. Five ML-based survival models were developed and compared using Harrell's concordance index (C-index). The predicted risk scores were used to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups and validated in the test set. Results: 205 patients were included for training and validation. Among the five ML models, the GBM-Cox model achieved the highest C-indices for both OS (0.617) and PFS (0.645) prediction. The predicted risk scores stratified the patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups for OS (median, 18.7 vs 13.6 vs 8.8 months; Conclusion: ML-based survival models successfully stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups for OS and PFS. Key features included ALBI score and alanine aminotransferase for OS, and macrovascular invasion and ALBI score for PFS. These models have the potential to guide clinicians' treatment decisions and provide prognostic evaluations. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts, as well as integration of imaging biomarkers are warranted to optimize these predictive models.

Indexed as

cox proportional hazards modelgradient boosting machineoverall survivalprogression-free survivalrandom survival forestsurvival models

Identifiers

PMID41323515
PMCPMC12664578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.