ArticleCancer informatics2025
Unsupervised Random Forest Identifies Important Genetic Prognostic Factors for Breast Cancer Survival Time.
Article in Cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell-type resolved transcriptional network analysis of in vivo cellular senescence following injury.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Breast cancer is one of the most prominent and deadly diseases in the world, and its prognosis varies widely based on the expression of certain genes. Identification of these genes is important for developing and interpreting clinical prognostic tests as well as furthering our understanding of breast cancer biology. We expand on prior efforts in the field toward identifying prognostic genes, by integrating powerful statistical methods. Methods: To this end, we use an unsupervised random forest model, which allows for robust learning of non-linear gene expression/survival relationships and the ability to identify the most important genes affecting both positive and negative breast cancer prognosis. In total, 1,518 participants were considered from the METABRIC dataset, using 20,387 mRNA expression level variables and 23 clinical variables including Results: Our research corroborates previous discoveries of 27 important prognostic genes while also identifying 3 genes as potentially novel prognostic factors. Based on gene ontology analysis, we additionally show that these genes have plausible connections to breast cancer biology that should be experimentally investigated. Conclusions: Here, we demonstrate the utility of the unsupervised random forest model over K-means clustering for identifying important genes in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.