Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

The Ethnography of Caring Networks: Disentangling a Governance Order

Oemar van der Woerd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Oemar van der WoerdDepartment of Healthcare Governance and Erasmus Centre for Healthcare Management, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-8164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This thesis shifts attention from networks as well-demarcated governance structures to seeing networks as dynamic and emerging social phenomena. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Dutch older person and hospital care, it explores how networking unfolds in everyday governance actions and interactions of affected actors, and with which consequences for their role and work. This thesis calls for a recalibration of network thinking, highlighting the multiple, ongoing, place-based, multi-layered, and multi-purpose nature of networking. Rather than romanticizing network governance, this thesis offers a critical-pragmatist perspective, inviting a 'romantic-realist' engagement with the lived messiness of networks as a governance order-in-the-making amidst healthcare reforms.

Indexed as

ethnographyhealthcare managementinterpretative researchnetwork governance

Identifiers

PMID41323494
PMCPMC12658879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.