ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Long-term outcomes after colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a case series of four patients from a single centre.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colon interposition remains a valuable option for esophageal replacement in complex pediatric and young adult cases. However, long-term functional and nutritional outcomes remain variable. We report the long-term outcomes of four patients (age at surgery: 2-11 years; current age: 3-23 years) who underwent transverse colon interposition at our centre for indications including long-gap esophageal atresia (n=2) and corrosive strictures (n=2). Median follow-up exceeded five years. Nutritional outcomes were variable: two patients achieved normal growth, while two demonstrated stunting and undernutrition. Laboratory profiles revealed borderline anaemia in one patient, with otherwise preserved micronutrient status. PedsQL™ assessments showed normal physical functioning in three of four patients, although psychosocial scores were reduced in three. Radiological and endoscopic evaluation identified anastomotic strictures in all patients, with associated reflux and tortuosity in three. Colon interposition can provide durable esophageal continuity with satisfactory long-term function. Nonetheless, complications such as stricture, reflux, and impaired growth are common, underscoring the need for structured, long-term multidisciplinary surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.