ArticleDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra
Research Landscapes and Gaps in Neuropsychiatric Assessment for Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Bibliometric Study on Huntington's Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and Multiple System Atrophy.
Article in Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge mapping of alström syndrome research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis based on WoS data from 2000 to 2025.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the current application of tools used for assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) in patients with Huntington's disease (HD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and multiple system atrophy (MSA) through bibliometric analysis. Methods: Publications published between 2014 and 2023 were searched using the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC). Only articles and reviews published in the English language were included. CiteSpace was used to analyze the countries, keyword patterns, and reference co-citations. A detailed full-text analysis was further conducted across all studies to assess the usage of NPS assessment tools. Results: Our analysis included 530 publications demonstrating consistent annual growth, reflecting rising global interest in NPSs within neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases. However, these studies reveal research deficiency in current assessment methodologies that demands more attention. Research output remains predominantly concentrated in developed nations with aging populations, particularly the USA, which leads in both publication volume and quality. The primary focus of current research involves evaluating the validity of existing assessment tools, while emerging investigations explore next-generation assessment tools designed to enhance diagnostic precision and enable personalized treatment strategies. Despite these advances, widespread clinical adoption remains limited, and further validation studies are required to establish their reliability across diverse populations and disease stages. Conclusion: This study highlights the growing importance of NPSs in neurodegenerative diseases, particularly in HD, ALS, and MSA. We identify hotspots and deficiencies in the research field of validating NPS assessment tools, integrating NPSs into the diagnostic framework and elucidating neurobiological mechanisms. These findings will contribute to enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.