ReviewBMJ oncology2025
KRAS-targeted therapies in cancer: novel approaches and overcoming resistance.
Review in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in translational lung cancer research in 2025: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Identification of Actionable Gene Variants in Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Real-World Analysis of a Polish Cohort.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Targeting tumor transition windows.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Induction and characterization of neoplastic bladder tumors in a transgenic porcine model.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KRAS, once considered undruggable, has become actionable across specific alleles, with KRAS-G12C inhibitors now approved and next-generation approaches-including pan-KRAS/pan-RAS inhibitors, targeted degraders and RNA-based strategies-progressing rapidly. However, clinical benefit remains limited due to the frequent emergence of resistance. Escape mechanisms include on-target secondary mutations, pathway reactivation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, lineage plasticity and metabolic rewiring within an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Emerging evidence supports rational combination strategies, including parallel inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor, protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11 or SOS1 and vertical blockade of the mitogen-activated protein kinase-extracellular signal-regulated kinase or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-mechanistic target of rapamycin cascades; immunotherapies such as checkpoint blockade, T-cell receptor (TCR)-T cells, bispecific T-cell engagers or cytokine-armed oncolytic viruses; metabolic interventions targeting macropinocytosis or autophagy; as well as radiotherapy. Such combination therapies can transform primarily cytostatic effects into more durable antitumour responses, although with potential toxicity constraints. Precision approaches that integrate multiomics profiling with longitudinal circulating tumour DNA analysis enable biomarker-guided patient selection (eg, based on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.