ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
VitiForge: a new procedural pipeline approach for grapevine disease identification under data scarcity.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VitiForge: a new procedural pipeline approach for grapevine disease identification under data scarcity.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of grapevine diseases is critical for reducing yield losses and ensuring sustainable viticulture. CNNs trained on benchmark datasets such as PlantVillage often achieve near-perfect accuracy, yet this performance fails to translate to real-world field conditions where lighting, backgrounds, and lesion appearance vary widely. To address challenges of data scarcity and imbalance, this study introduces VitiForge, a novel procedural synthetic imagery pipeline for generating realistic synthetic grape leaf textures representing healthy, Black Rot, Esca, and Leaf Blight conditions. VitiForge is systematically evaluated against GAN-based augmentation through a data ablation study on PlantVillage and FieldVitis, a curated field dataset, using MobileNetV2, InceptionV3, and ResNet50V2 classifiers. Results show that VitiForge significantly improves performance in low-data regimes, enabling model training even without real samples, whereas GAN augmentation proves more effective once sufficient real data is available. On field imagery, VitiForge often matched or surpassed GAN-based methods, particularly when paired with MobileNetV2. These findings highlight the complementary roles of procedural and GAN-based synthetic data: VitiForge offers flexibility and scalability under cross-domain and data-scarce conditions, while GANs enhance realism and variability when ample data exists. Together, they support the development of robust and generalizable models for automated grape disease detection in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.