ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
Assessing the feasibility of interactions within a computer-generated virtual reality for people with dementia.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global prevalence of dementia is increasing, necessitating effective non-pharmacological interventions due to the limitations and side effects of pharmacological treatments. Digital health interventions, including Virtual Reality (VR), offer promising alternatives. This study assessed the feasibility, safety, and potential side effects of interactive computer-generated VR (CGVR) for individuals with dementia (IwD), focusing on reaction tests of varying complexity. Methods: In the feasibility study recruited 32 participants with mild to moderate dementia, assessed by the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE). Participants underwent a single CGVR session involving virtual reaction wall tasks of varying difficulty. Pre- and post-exposure assessments, alongside feedback forms, evaluated cognitive and motor functions, mood, anxiety, and balance (paired t-test). Results: Of the 32 participants, 29 completed the study (9% drop-out). Observational data indicated high levels of engagement and enjoyment. No adverse effects on cognitive or motor functions were observed, with slight non-significant improvements across most parameters. MMSE scores correlated significantly with task feasibility and reaction/motor times, highlighting the influence of cognitive status on performance. Conclusions: CGVR demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability among IwD, with no adverse effects and potential to enhance cognitive and motor skills. Further research is required to explore long-term efficacy and optimize therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.