ArticleEngineering biology
Plant Cell Strain Improvement Through Engineering Biology for Industrial Plant Cell Culture.
Article in Engineering biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Regulatory Frameworks for Bioactive Inputs in Plant Systems Producing Pharmaceutically Important Compounds.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Editorial: Advances in microbial-based solutions: food coloring, flavoring and fragrance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Plant Cell Strain Improvement Through Engineering Biology for Industrial Plant Cell Culture.Engineering biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant cell culture (PCC) presents a promising and sustainable alternative to traditional agricultural methods for producing specialty bioactive compounds. However, its widespread industrial application has been hindered by challenges such as low yields, cell line instability and inconsistent product quality. engineering biology (EB) offers a powerful toolkit to overcome these limitations by systematically improving plant cell lines. This review focuses on the application of EB principles to enhance PCC for the production of high-value bioactives from an industry-oriented perspective. We explore three core pillars of the EB toolkit: (1) Multiomics and in silico design, which leverage comprehensive data integration and predictive modelling for rational target identification; (2) gene manipulation and pathway bioengineering, encompassing precise genome editing (e.g., CRISPR/Cas), synthetic gene circuits and directed evolution for targeted metabolic reprogramming and (3) biosensors for high-throughput screening and real-time monitoring, enabling rapid testing and optimisation of engineered cell lines. The synergistic integration of these tools within the iterative design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle is highlighted as a key strategy for accelerating strain improvement. Ultimately, the convergence of these EB approaches is transforming PCC into a robust platform for producing pharmaceuticals, functional foods and green chemicals, contributing to a biobased economy with a minimal ecological footprint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.