Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323290›Full record

ArticleNew Zealand journal of educational studies2025

Enhancing Rangatahi Wellbeing in Secondary Education Through Implementation of the Meke Meter™.

Dana Armstrong, Anita Jagroop-Dearing, Rachel H Forrest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New Zealand journal of educational studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dana ArmstrongFaculty of Education, Humanities and Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.
Anita Jagroop-DearingFaculty of Education, Humanities and Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9770-3287
Rachel H ForrestFaculty of Education, Humanities and Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-0493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent wellbeing is crucial, yet secondary schools face challenges in effectively addressing it. The Meke Meter™, an indigenous self-reflection tool, shows promise in promoting wellbeing, but its application in secondary schools remains unexplored. This study investigates the suitability and efficacy of the Meke Meter™ in capturing the self-evaluated wellbeing of rangatahi (adolescents) in Aotearoa New Zealand secondary schools. A qualitative multiple case study design was employed, involving two case studies: one in a mainstream co-educational school using the paper-based Meke Meter™, and another in an alternative education program using the online version. Data collection involved questionnaires for students and teachers, analysed through inductive thematic analysis and appreciative inquiry. Both students and teachers found the Meke Meter™ appealing and valuable for self-reflection and goal-setting. The tool's ease of use, visual design, and alignment with the curriculum were highlighted. It facilitated pastoral care, student voice, and co-construction of learning. However, challenges in data tracking and the need for clearer explanations and additional resources were identified. The Meke Meter™ shows promise in promoting rangatahi wellbeing in secondary schools. Future development should focus on a mobile app with goal-setting, gamification, and notification features. Comprehensive consultation with stakeholders is crucial to ensure cultural safety and effectiveness. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40841-025-00390-6.

Indexed as

AdolescentAotearoa New ZealandRangatahiSecondary educationStudentWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41323290
PMCPMC12657541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.