Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323262›Full record

ArticleSN computer science2025

Fast and Secure Multiparty Querying over Federated Graph Databases.

Nouf Aljuaid, Alexei Lisitsa, Sven Schewe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nouf AljuaidDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944 Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-8395
Alexei LisitsaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sven ScheweDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a framework for efficient privacy preserving multi-party querying (PPMQ) over federated graph databases, leveraging Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) protocols to enhance data security. The system offers two distinct security protocols: a client-based protocol and a server-based protocol. In the client-based protocol, standard SMPC techniques are employed, allowing computations to be performed on data without exposing the data itself. The server-based protocol employs SMPC to facilitate secure data processing and is further enhanced by encrypted hashing, which adds an additional layer of security to prevent data exposure. We conducted experiments comparing PPMQ with Neo4j Fabric and two previous systems, SMPQ and Conclave. The results indicate that PPMQ's execution times and overheads are comparable to those of Neo4j Fabric, while outperforming both SMPQ and Conclave, demonstrating its superior efficiency. Additionally, PPMQ, like SMPQ and Conclave, utilises an honest but curious security model. However, it enhances the security of the server protocol, making it more robust against brute force attacks and providing stronger privacy guarantees than previous solutions.

Indexed as

Federated databasesGraph databasesNeo4jSecure multi-party queryingSMPC

Identifiers

PMID41323262
PMCPMC12662885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.