ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Assessment of functional decline in stroke patients using 3D deep learning and dynamic functional connectivity based on resting-state fMRI.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to develop an automated approach for assessing upper limb (UL) motor impairment severity in stroke patients using a deep learning framework applied to resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Methods: Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) was computed with the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) as a seed and extracted from rs-fMRI data of 69 stroke patients. These dFC features were used to train a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) for automatic classification of UL motor impairment severity. Patients were divided into two groups according to UL Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UL-FMA) scores: mild-to-moderate impairment (UL-FMA > 20; Results: The model achieved a balanced accuracy of 99.8% ± 0.2%, with a specificity of 99.9% ± 0.2% and a sensitivity of 99.7% ± 0.3%. Several brain regions-including the angular gyrus, medial orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, supplementary motor area, thalamus, cerebellum, and middle temporal gyrus-were linked to UL motor impairment severity. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that a 3D deep learning framework based on dFC features from rs-fMRI enables highly accurate and objective classification of UL motor impairment in stroke patients. This approach may provide a valuable alternative to manual UL-FMA scoring, particularly in clinical settings with limited access to experienced evaluators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.