SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Guillain-Barre syndrome in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies but is increasingly associated with unique neurotoxic complications. While cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well-characterized, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) remains a rare and underrecognized adverse event. This PRISMA-guided systematic review, supplemented by a novel case report, outlines the clinical, radiographic, and diagnostic characteristics of GBS following CAR T-cell therapy. A total of 10 cases were evaluated, including a case from our institution involving a 30-year-old male with high-grade B-cell lymphoma who developed GBS with lasting neurological deficits despite treatment. Across reported cases, the onset of GBS ranged from 5 to 78 days following CAR T-cell infusion and was frequently preceded by CRS. Notably, 60% of patients exhibited facial nerve involvement, with cranial neuropathies often preceding peripheral symptoms, an atypical presentation that differs from classic GBS. Radiographic imaging often demonstrated facial nerve enhancement, while cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed albuminocytologic dissociation with mild pleocytosis. Although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was the mainstay treatment, clinical responses were limited, raising questions about pathophysiology. Unlike classic GBS, which is typically antibody-mediated, CAR T-cell-associated GBS may stem from non-specific immune activation and cytokine-driven bystander injury. This review suggests CAR T-cell-related GBS may represent a distinct clinical entity with unique radiologic findings. Early recognition and further mechanistic investigation are essential to guide effective management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.