ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
A multi-institutional dummy run on segmentation variability and plan quality of stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Definitive radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: current practice and future directions.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Oligometastatic disease represents limited metastatic burden, and local ablative therapies such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve survival. However, inter-institutional variability in target segmentation and treatment planning can compromise treatment quality. This study aimed to evaluate the segmentation variability and dose distribution quality of SBRT in oligometastatic settings using a multi-institutional dummy run approach. Methods and materials: Sixty-nine institutions were provided with two anonymized cases of adrenal and spine metastases to delineate targets and organs at risk (OARs) and create intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans following a protocol. Variability was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance, and mean distance to agreement. Plan qualities were assessed using the Paddick conformity index, modified gradient index, and a new three-dimensional conformity-gradient index (3D-CGI). Knowledge-based planning (KBP) was applied to explore potential improvements in OAR sparing. Results: All submitted plans met protocol dose constraints. However, substantial segmentation variability was observed, particularly for the spine case. Among 136 plans, 79% demonstrated acceptable conformity and dose gradients, with 3D-CGI < 6 correlating with favorable distributions. Mean DSC was 0.93 for the clinical target volume and 0.76 for the cauda equina, which showed the highest variability. KBP reduced OAR doses for the adrenal case but showed limited impact for the spine case. Conclusions: Although dose constraints were achieved, segmentation variability remained substantial, particularly for the cauda equina in the spine case. These findings emphasize inter-institutional differences and the need for standardization and tools to improve SBRT consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.