ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
The comparative pathology workbench: An update.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Comparative Pathology Workbench (CPW) is a web-browser-based visual analytics platform providing shared access to an interactive "spreadsheet" style presentation of image data and associated analysis data. The software was developed to enable pathologists and other clinical and research users to compare histopathological images of diseased and/or normal tissues between different samples of the same or different patients/species. The CPW provides a grid layout of cells in rows and columns so that images that correspond to matching data can be organized in the form of an image-enabled "spreadsheet". An individual workbench or bench can be shared with other users with read-only or full edit access as required. In addition, each bench cell or the whole bench itself has an associated discussion thread to allow collaborative analysis and consensual interpretation of the data. Here, we present the updated system based on 2 years of active use in the field that generated constructive feedback. The updates deliver new capabilities, including automated importation of entire image collections, sorting image collections, long running tasks, public benches, uploading miscellaneous image types, refining search facilities, enabling use of tags, and improving efficiency, speed, and user-friendliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.