Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323155›Full record

Observational studyPediatric diabetes2025

Comparative Effectiveness of Switching From First-Generation Basal Insulins to Either Glargine 300 U/mL or Degludec 100 U/mL in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Results From the ISPED CARD Clinical Registry.

Ivana Rabbone, Riccardo Bonfanti, Giusi Graziano, Fortunato Lombardo, Antonio Nicolucci, Marco Marigliano, Maria Chiara Rossi, Giacomo Vespasiani, Valentino Cherubini

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivana RabboneDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-146X
Riccardo BonfantiDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Diabetology Unit, Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4104-2763
Giusi GrazianoCORESEARCH - Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3347-8049
Fortunato LombardoDepartment of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7081-5884
Antonio NicolucciCORESEARCH - Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5939-6850
Marco MariglianoDepartment of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, Section of Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3232-8807
Maria Chiara RossiCORESEARCH - Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8696-4238
Giacomo VespasianiMeteda Srl, San Benedetto del Tronto (AP), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-485X
Valentino CherubiniDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, G. Salesi Hospital, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7664-1475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To assess the real-world effectiveness of switching from first-generation basal insulins (1BIs) to either glargine U300 (Gla-300) or degludec U100 (Deg-100) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D), using data from the Italian ISPED CARD clinical registry. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study included 1063 pediatric patients with T1D from 22 diabetes centers across Italy who switched from 1BI to either Gla-300 (64.6%) or Deg-100 (35.4%) between 2021 and 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable groups ( Results: Both groups showed significant and clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c at 6 months from ~ 8.7% to ~ 7.4% (-1.3 percentage points), maintained at 12 months, with no significant differences between groups. FBG also decreased significantly in both groups, slightly favoring Deg-100, but without statistical significance between groups. BMI/SDS remained stable. Gla-300 was associated with a slight increase in basal insulin dose over 12 months, while Deg-100 showed a temporary reduction at 6 months. A significant reduction in short-acting insulin dose (-0.03 U/kg) was observed in both groups. Conclusion: Switching from 1BI to either Gla-300 or Deg-100 significantly improves glycemic control in pediatric T1D patients without weight gain. Although both insulins showed comparable effectiveness, differences in titration patterns highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies and improved clinician education in insulin optimization. Safety outcomes, particularly hypoglycemia, could not be assessed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Drug SubstitutionHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingAdolescentBlood GlucoseChildFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansItalyMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-Actingbasal insulin analoguesclinical registrydegludec 100 U/mLglargine 300 U/mLpediatric diabetesreal-world evidencetype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41323155
PMCPMC12662695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.