Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323145›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025

Risk Mapping of African Swine Fever in Domestic Pigs and Wild Boars to Enhance Management and Surveillance in Asia.

Nijiho Kawaguchi, Cecilia Aguilar-Vega, Michihito Sasaki, Yasuko Orba, Hirofumi Sawa, José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Norikazu Isoda, Jaime Bosch, Satoshi Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nijiho KawaguchiVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cecilia Aguilar-VegaVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-7291
Michihito SasakiDivision of Molecular Pathobiology, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yasuko OrbaDivision of Molecular Pathobiology, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hirofumi SawaInstitute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
José Manuel Sánchez-VizcaínoVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Norikazu IsodaInstitute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-988X
Jaime BoschVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5397-471X
Satoshi ItoVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-7520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal disease affecting domestic pigs and wild boars, caused by the ASF virus (ASFV), which has rapidly spread across Asia in recent years. In this region, most reported ASF cases involve domestic pigs, while cases in wild boars remain notably lower except in a few countries. However, factors such as the high population of wild boars, limited wildlife surveillance, and inadequate farm biosecurity suggest that the prevalence and transmission of ASFV between these hosts may be underestimated. Therefore, we used a simplified multicriteria approach (SMCA) to identify vulnerable areas (VAs) for ASFV infection and validated the resulting VA maps with chi-square tests using reported ASF cases. The spatial SMCA revealed that VAs for ASFV infection in domestic pigs are concentrated in eastern China, while high-risk zones for ASFV infection in wild boars span Russia, eastern China, and Southeast Asia. Sensitity analysis showed that the variables that most influenced the risk of ASFV infection in domestic pigs and wild boars were anthropogenic factors and distribution of wild boars, respectively. Additionally, we predicted areas with significant transmission potential between domestic pigs and wild boars. High-risk regions for interspecies transmission include eastern China, southwestern Korea, and southern Japan. This study offers a standardized method to assess ASFV infection risk across Asia by integrating environmental and anthropogenic factors rather than relying solely on reported outbreaks. The findings highlight potential high-risk regions, including those without detected outbreaks, to improve surveillance and early detection strategies.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverEpidemiological MonitoringAnimalsAsiaRisk AssessmentSus scrofaAfrican swine feverAsiadomestic pigsepidemiologyGISrisk assessmentSus scrofaunderreportingwild boarwildlife management

Identifiers

PMID41323145
PMCPMC12662683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.