Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323142›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Interdisciplinary Solidarity: Advancing Medical Student Education in Healthcare Advocacy.

Natasha Dark, Luke Chao, Mia Lobitz, Luke Sanchez, Lauren Anderson, Hannah Herring, Ahmed Raihane, Amy Clithero-Eridon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natasha DarkUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5842-7202
Luke ChaoUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5042-3994
Mia LobitzUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Luke SanchezUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Lauren AndersonUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Hannah HerringUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Ahmed RaihaneUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-7758
Amy Clithero-EridonDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-3725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is increasingly important to create longitudinal advocacy education opportunities starting as early as medical school to train physicians capable of handling the complexities of the social determinants of health that they will encounter in their communities. This is a brief overview of the journey of medical students in developing an interdisciplinary, longitudinal advocacy curriculum at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine (UNM SOM). Methods: The Healthcare Advocacy Initiative of New Mexico (HAINM) has disseminated information on the significance and structure of health policy in New Mexico through various educational opportunities by communicating with state representatives, community advocates, law students, professors, and professional advocacy organizations. To analyze the significance of these experiences, a survey was conducted at the capstone event. Results: Pre- and post-test survey responses from the interprofessional "Med/Law/Psych Day 2025" event were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Two events were found to be statistically significant (developing a plan to change policy related to healthcare issues and teaching other peers advocacy skills) with Discussion: HAINM has become a hub for a continuous medical advocacy curriculum that is available to medical students through all 4 years of training. This provides interested students with a solid foundation, a skill set, and a network to pursue interprofessional advocacy work successfully.

Indexed as

curriculum developmenthealthcare advocacy educationinterprofessional educationlongitudinal medical student curriculummedical student education

Identifiers

PMID41323142
PMCPMC12657764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.