ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
The Role of Medical Training in Ensuring Gender-Affirming Care Access in 2025 and Beyond.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical and hormonal gender-affirming care: cross-domain determinants and artificial intelligence-enabled expansion.International journal for equity in health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolving landscape of transgender healthcare in the United States has become more fraught with challenges following the 2024 presidential election and associated policy shifts, especially with the implementation of Executive Order 14168 (EO 14168). EO 14168 mandates a binary understanding of gender based on biological sex assigned at birth and imposes constraints on federal funding, academic freedom, and access to medical training related to gender-affirming care. Although the order is currently under legal challenge and its implementation remains uneven, it has already caused tangible disruptions in academic medical settings, with transgender clinics reporting increased patient anxiety, reduced visibility of LGBTQ + content in federal resources, and institutional self-censorship of curricular content, even moreso in areas struggling with LGBTQ + inclusion prior to EO 14168. Medical education, which has historically lacked comprehensive training on transgender health, is now at heightened risk of inadequate preparation for future physicians. Many medical schools continue to struggle with core curricula on gender-affirming care, leaving providers unprepared to meet the unique needs of transgender patients. This paper provides concrete examples of how EO 14168 has affected medical education and offers 5 evidence-based strategies, including as faculty development programs, protected simulation-based curricula, and institutional policy adaptations, to resist censorship and preserve high-quality, inclusive care training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.