Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323110›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

On the recurrent neural network model with robust expectile-based loss function in economic data forecasting.

Wisnowan Hendy Saputra, Rinda Nariswari, Matthew Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wisnowan Hendy SaputraComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11530, Indonesia.
Rinda NariswariStatistics Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11530, Indonesia.
Matthew OwenStatistics Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11530, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), particularly their Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) variants, are standard methods for modeling sequential data. However, their robustness is often limited when faced with non-stationary and heterogeneous time series data. This limitation is largely due to their reliance on symmetric loss functions such as mean squared error, which implicitly assume homogeneous data patterns. To address this, we propose a new framework, Expectile-based Recurrent Neural Network (E-RNN), which integrates expectile regression into the RNN architecture. We implement and compare two E-RNN variants, namely E-LSTM and E-GRU, to obtain the best forecast. . By leveraging the asymmetric least squares loss function, the E-RNN model is able to model various parts of the conditional data distribution, not just its central tendency. This allows forecasting across scenarios, ranging from pessimistic to optimistic, by adjusting the asymmetric parameter (

Indexed as

Economic forecastingExpectileGated recurrent unitLong-short term memoryRecurrent neural network

Identifiers

PMID41323110
PMCPMC12664051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.