ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Endemic Vascular Epiphytes: Integrating Protected Areas and Suitability Models in the Amazon Forest.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endemic Vascular Epiphytes: Integrating Protected Areas and Suitability Models in the Amazon Forest.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the number of vascular epiphytes endemic to the Amazon forest, estimate the distribution of 20 endemic vascular epiphytes (EVEs) using species distribution modeling (SDMs), and examine their potential occurrence inside and outside Amazonian Protected Areas (PAs) to predict potential habitats and conservation strategies. The study was carried out in the Amazon rainforest, focusing on PAs and their interactions with the distribution of EVEs. We used four primary sources of biodiversity data (GBIF, Kew Herbarium, Species Link, and Amazon inventories) to uncover the composition of endemic epiphytes. Fifteen EVEs were selected based on occurrence records from at least 17 locations. The research used a large dataset of epiphyte collections, eight modeling algorithms, and 34 environmental variables to generate consensus maps that identify suitable habitats for EVEs. The main results indicated that most EVEs have suitable areas concentrated along the edges of the Amazon rainforest, especially on the slopes of the Andes, with limited suitability in central and eastern Amazonia. The largest areas of suitability for the 20 model species were greater in unprotected areas (79%) than in protected areas (76.5%). The overlap between suitable areas and PAs highlights the importance of these areas in protecting EVEs. However, the significant presence of habitats outside PAs requires management strategies that go beyond their boundaries. The findings offer critical insights for biodiversity conservation and for planning actions to safeguard the diversity of Amazonian epiphytes in the face of increasing pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.