Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323030›Full record

ReviewAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

Exploration of virtual reality applications in myopia: A systematic review.

Xiaona Ping, Juno Kim, Nayuta Yoshioka, Padmaja Sankaridurg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaona PingSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Juno KimSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nayuta YoshiokaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Padmaja SankaridurgSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple interventions are available to prevent or slow myopia progression, the rapidly rising prevalence highlights the need to enhance both the development of novel approaches and adherence to existing strategies. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology in ophthalmology and vision science, yet its potential applications in myopia remain underexplored. Main text: To explore the prior application, if any, of VR in myopia research. A systematic search was conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect, to identify journal articles and conference proceedings reporting application of VR in myopia. The search terms used were "Virtual Reality", "VR", "myopia", "nearsightedness", "shortsightedness", "refractive errors", and "refractive disorder". The search covered publications from inception to April 6, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, with assessments performed independently by two authors. Conclusion: A total of sixteen articles fit the criteria and were included in the review. Of these, seven investigated VR-based interventions for myopia, an additional four were focused on testing and diagnostic applications, three articles reported on vision training, and the remaining two articles were related to educational uses. None were related to myopia control. All studies were published between 2016 and 2024. With respect to the VR technologies, eleven studies utilized commercial VR headsets and/or smartphones paired with VR viewers as experimental devices. Fully immersive virtual environments or systems were also commonly employed in the included studies. Most studies focused on the usability and validity of VR technologies in this context. Conclusions: None of the articles reported on the efficacy of VR in preventing or slowing myopia progression, however, our review identified the potential of VR in auxiliary aspects of myopia, including testing, diagnosis, intervention, vision training, and education. Further research is warranted to evaluate the practical feasibility, clinical effectiveness, safety, and broader applicability of VR technologies in myopia.

Indexed as

DiagnosisEducationMyopiaSystematic reviewTestingVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41323030
PMCPMC12657726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.