Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41323004›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Deep Learning in Scaphoid Fracture Detection and Healing Prediction: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hand Surgery.

Gaurav Jha, Roopkaran Dhanjal, Surya Malasani, Alvin V Karunakaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaurav JhaTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Roopkaran DhanjalEmergency Medicine, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Surya MalasaniTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Alvin V KarunakaranTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone injuries and continue to pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their tendency for delayed union or non-union. Interpretation variability and delayed detection remain key contributors to missed injuries and adverse outcomes. Deep learning (DL) models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown strong performance in musculoskeletal imaging and offer potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostication in hand surgery. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and PMC was conducted covering January 2015 to March 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Studies were eligible if they applied DL algorithms to detect or classify scaphoid fractures or to predict union and non-union, and reported at least one diagnostic metric (accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, or specificity). Traditional machine-learning approaches, cadaveric studies, and non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Fourteen peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. Twelve evaluated DL for fracture detection, and two assessed fracture-healing prediction. Across detection studies, CNN-based models reported accuracies of 81-96% and AUCs up to 0.97. Transfer-learning architectures (DenseNet, ResNet, EfficientNet) consistently outperformed custom CNNs, particularly in multicentre datasets. Multi-view fusion of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs improved recall by approximately 12 percentage points compared with single-view analysis. Segmentation-enhanced models showed notable gains in occult fracture detection, identifying up to 41% of occult injuries compared with 6.8-13.7% by clinical experts. AI-augmented decision support improved novice radiologist performance, increasing AUC by 9-14 percentage points. For healing prediction, a custom CNN achieved 93.6% accuracy for post-surgical union, while a YOLOv5-ResNet-50 system classified union, non-union, or osteonecrosis with 91% accuracy (AUC 0.96). DL models demonstrate radiologist-level performance for scaphoid fracture detection and show encouraging potential for predicting union. Approaches incorporating segmentation, transfer learning, and multi-view inputs appear particularly promising for clinical workflows. Although early results support integration of AI-assisted tools into diagnostic pathways, robust multicentre validation and explainability frameworks remain essential before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksdeep learninghand surgerynon-unionscaphoid fracture

Identifiers

PMID41323004
PMCPMC12658349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.