Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322993›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Demystifying Surgical Training in the UK: A Trainee-Led Global Teaching Initiative for Surgical Career Aspirants.

Jefferson George, Indhu Poomalai, Fraser Morgan, Surya Malasani, Vivek Thakker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jefferson GeorgeTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Indhu PoomalaiTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Fraser MorganGeneral Practice, The Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, GBR.
Surya MalasaniTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.
Vivek ThakkerTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The UK (United Kingdom) surgical training programme has evolved tremendously over the last decade. With the introduction of the European Working Time Directive and the lifting of the Resident Market Labour Test (RMLT) restrictions for International Medical Graduates (IMGs), there has been a shift in the dynamics of entering surgical training programmes. While these changes opened opportunities, numerous questions regarding the entry process and the nature of the training itself, such as application process, portfolio-building expectations, speciality-specific roles and day-to-day clinical responsibilities, have remained unanswered. This underscores the need for targeted educational interventions that address these practical challenges and improve preparedness for UK surgical training. This study evaluated the impact of a trainee-led, webinar-based educational programme designed to improve understanding of UK surgical training and to support aspiring surgical trainees, with a specific focus on inclusivity, accessibility and representation of IMGs. Methods A 7-part teaching series was created collaboratively by the West Midlands' Foundation Trainee Surgical Society (FTSS) and the Surgical Society of International Doctors (SSID), using guidance from Health Education England and the Royal Colleges. The programme was delivered live on the MedAll platform and tailored using a pre-course needs assessment survey. Participants completed pre- and post-session questionnaires assessing confidence across four domains: understanding the surgical training pathway, application and portfolio readiness, speciality-specific roles, and management of surgical emergencies. Responses were measured using 5-point Likert scales. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Qualitative feedback underwent thematic analysis. Results Two hundred eighty-five attendees from 38 countries attended the teaching programme and completed the questionnaires. Statistically significant improvements were observed across all domains (

Indexed as

diversity and inclusioninternational medical graduates (imgs)medical educationonline teachingsurgical educationwebinar series

Identifiers

PMID41322993
PMCPMC12662190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.