ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Specific reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants in neurosurgical emergencies - a systematic review.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Andexanet Alfa Withdrawn from the US: Implications for Intracranial Hemorrhage Care.CNS drugs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used but pose significant challenges in emergency neurosurgical settings. Idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are approved reversal agents, yet their effectiveness and safety in neurosurgical emergencies remain unclear. Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the current evidence on DOAC reversal in patients undergoing emergency neurosurgical interventions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of case series of a minimum of 5 patients on DOACs receiving andexanet or idarucizumab for emergency neurosurgery (<24 hours after the last DOAC intake). The primary outcome was safety, defined by hemostatic efficacy. Secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events, mortality, and the functional clinical outcome. Results: Seven studies, comprising 148 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Andexanet was investigated in 4 studies, including 37 patients. Adequate intraoperative hemostasis was confirmed in 80% to 100% of patients. One study showed a thromboembolic event rate of 8.3% and an in-hospital mortality rate of 50% in 12 patients, while others showed lower rates. Idarucizumab was analyzed in 3 studies of 111 patients, of whom 97 were from a single large cohort. Satisfactory hemostasis was reported in 93.5% to 100% of patients. Thromboembolic event rates ranged from 0% to 4.1% and mortality rates were 0%, 3.1%, and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The use of DOAC reversal agents in emergency neurosurgery appears feasible and may support surgical hemostasis in selected patients. However, further research is warranted, particularly regarding the off-label use of andexanet, given the limited evidence and potential safety concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.