Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322969›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Specific reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants in neurosurgical emergencies - a systematic review.

Laura Zeller, Jonas Rohr, Giovanna Brandi, Christoph Globas, Alexander Kaserer, Matthias Greutmann, Tilman Schubert, Jan-Dirk Studt, Katharina Geiling, Luca Regli and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura ZellerNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas RohrDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Giovanna BrandiNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph GlobasClinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander KasererInstitute of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GreutmannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tilman SchubertClinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan-Dirk StudtDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Katharina GeilingDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Aging Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Menno R GermansDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used but pose significant challenges in emergency neurosurgical settings. Idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are approved reversal agents, yet their effectiveness and safety in neurosurgical emergencies remain unclear. Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the current evidence on DOAC reversal in patients undergoing emergency neurosurgical interventions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of case series of a minimum of 5 patients on DOACs receiving andexanet or idarucizumab for emergency neurosurgery (<24 hours after the last DOAC intake). The primary outcome was safety, defined by hemostatic efficacy. Secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events, mortality, and the functional clinical outcome. Results: Seven studies, comprising 148 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Andexanet was investigated in 4 studies, including 37 patients. Adequate intraoperative hemostasis was confirmed in 80% to 100% of patients. One study showed a thromboembolic event rate of 8.3% and an in-hospital mortality rate of 50% in 12 patients, while others showed lower rates. Idarucizumab was analyzed in 3 studies of 111 patients, of whom 97 were from a single large cohort. Satisfactory hemostasis was reported in 93.5% to 100% of patients. Thromboembolic event rates ranged from 0% to 4.1% and mortality rates were 0%, 3.1%, and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The use of DOAC reversal agents in emergency neurosurgery appears feasible and may support surgical hemostasis in selected patients. However, further research is warranted, particularly regarding the off-label use of andexanet, given the limited evidence and potential safety concerns.

Indexed as

andexanet alfahemostasis in surgeryidarucizumabneurosurgeryneurosurgical emergenciesoral anticoagulant reversalperioperative managementspecific reversal agent

Identifiers

PMID41322969
PMCPMC12663499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.