Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322956›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Clinical and Pathological Features Associated with Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence: Analysis from a Nationwide Cohort.

Arthur Peyrottes, Edouard Auclin, Marc-Olivier Timsit, Nicolas Branger, Nicolas Doumerc, Thibaut Waeckel, Pierre Bigot, Louis Surlemont, Sophie Knipper, Géraldine Pignot and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Arthur PeyrottesDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Edouard AuclinOncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Marc-Olivier TimsitDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Nicolas BrangerDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Nicolas DoumercDepartment of Urology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Thibaut WaeckelDepartment of Urology, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
Pierre BigotDepartment of Urology, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
Louis SurlemontDepartment of Urology, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Sophie KnipperDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Géraldine PignotDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Frank BruyèreDepartment of Urology, CHU Tours, Tours, France.
Alexis FontenilDepartment of Urology, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Bastien ParierDepartment of Urology, CHU Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Cécile ChampyDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, INSERM, Clinical Investigation Center 1430, Créteil, France.
Morgan RouprêtDepartment of Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, CHU Pitié-Salpêtriere, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Jean-Jacques PatardDepartment of Urology, CH Mont-de-Marsan, Mont-de-Marsan, France.
François HenonDepartment of Urology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Gaëlle FiardDepartment of Urology, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Julien GuillotreauDepartment of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Baptiste BeauvalDepartment of Urology, Clinique Croix du Sud, Toulouse, France.
Constance MichelDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.
Simon BernardeauDepartment of Urology, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Fayek TahaDepartment of Urology, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
Richard MalletDepartment of Urology, Polyclinique Francheville, Périgueux, France.
Frederic PanthierDepartment of Urology, CHU Tenon, Paris, France.
Laurent GuyDepartment of Urology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Louis VignotDepartment of Urology, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
Zine-Eddine KheneDepartment of Urology, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Jean-Christophe BernhardDepartment of Urology, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Arnaud MéjeanDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
François AudenetDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare renal malignancy with a generally favourable prognosis. However, a subset of patients experiences recurrence, which remains poorly characterised. This study aims to identify the clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence in chRCC, describe the timing and anatomical patterns of recurrence, and develop a predictive model to guide surveillance strategies. Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study using data from the French UroCCR database, including patients treated surgically for nonmetastatic chRCC between 2010 and 2024. Clinicopathological features, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analysed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportional-hazard models were used to assess prognostic factors. Key findings and limitations: Among the included 683 patients, 43 (6.3%) developed recurrence, with median RFS of 142 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 121-not reached). Local recurrence was observed in 30 patients, while 18 developed distant metastases, predominantly in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes and lungs. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, 95% CI 1.27-7.54, Conclusions and clinical implications: This study provides novel insights into the recurrence patterns of chRCC, highlighting the key prognostic factors. The proposed predictive model was designed to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients, optimising follow-up intensity, and guiding therapeutic decisions. Patient summary: We studied a rare kidney cancer type, called chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), to understand why some patients experience recurrence. We found that being male, having advanced disease, or some aggressive pathological characteristics increased the risk of cancer coming back. Our results suggest that doctors should monitor certain patients more closely after surgery. This research may help improve long-term follow-up and treatment plans for patients with chRCC. While certain factors are associated with a higher risk of recurrence, it is important to note that chromophobe renal cell carcinoma generally has a favourable prognosis, and the absolute risk of recurrence remains low for most patients.

Indexed as

Chromophobe carcinomaNephrectomyPrognosisRecurrence-free survivalRenal cell cancer

Identifiers

PMID41322956
PMCPMC12663658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.