ArticleCureus2025
The Recovery Deficit: A Simulation Model of Physician Performance Under Sleep Deprivation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sleepiness During Night Shifts and Nurses' Self-Reported Cognitive Control, Cognitive Flexibility, and Handover Effectiveness: A Cross-Sectional Study.International nursing review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical education policy has focused on duty hours as the primary lever for safety and training quality. This work-centric framing treats sleep as residual time rather than a prerequisite for learning and safe practice. As a result, trainees often operate in chronic sleep debt, accumulating a performance and safety deficit that duty-hour counts alone cannot resolve.
objectiveThis study uses Monte Carlo simulation to quantify how sleep deprivation affects clinician performance, safety, and well-being and establishes evidence-based sleep visualizations to promote recovery-centered residency redesign. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsComputer-based Monte Carlo simulation (Stata 18.0), parameterized from experimental and cohort literature on sleep restriction and clinical performance. Each of 500 iterations generated 11,000 synthetic clinician-days uniformly across medical students, residents, and attending physicians. Nightly sleep was the primary exposure; outcomes included reaction time, clinical and diagnostic accuracy, attentional lapses, medical errors, mood, and burnout. Outputs were baselined to the ≥8 h sleep category to visualize the deficit relative to a rested state.
resultsPerformance declined steeply with shorter sleep. Composite score fell from 83.3 (≥8 h) to 56.8 (4 h), 38.9 (2 h), and 9.0 (0 h). Reaction time slowed from 280 ms (≥8 h) to 404 ms (4 h) and 602 ms (0 h). Error risk rose markedly: <4 h vs ≥4 h, 16.2% vs 6.8% (OR: 2.62; risk difference +9.3 pp); <6 h vs ≥6 h, 9.7% vs 6.0% (RR: 1.62; OR 1.68; risk difference +3.7 pp). Burnout prevalence (modeled probability) increased from 12.8% (≥8 h) to 51.3% (0 h). Uncertainty was summarized using simulation percentiles across iterations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Duty-hour counts alone obscure a daily performance and safety deficit driven by inadequate recovery sleep. Quantifying and visualizing this deficit shows severe, dose-dependent impairments and elevated error risk with short sleep, supporting a recovery-first training model that designs duty hours around protected seven to nine hours of sleep to enhance patient safety, learning, and clinician well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.