ArticleCureus2025
The Toxic Price of Beauty: Impact of Common Nail and Hair Care Products on Indoor Air Quality and Effectiveness of Air Purification.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndoor air pollution caused by cosmetic products is an increasing public health concern, particularly for nail and hair salon workers frequently exposed to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and fine particulate matter. These substances are associated with respiratory, neurological, and reproductive health risks.
methodsExperiments were conducted in a sealed 270 ft³ room using a digital air quality monitor to measure the air quality index (AQI), total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), formaldehyde (HCHO), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Nail polish, acetone-based remover, hairspray, and hair dye were individually and jointly tested. Two purification methods were compared: an exhaust fan (80 cubic feet per minute) and an air purifier equipped with HEPA and activated carbon filters (239 cubic feet per minute).
resultsAll tested products worsened indoor air quality, with hairspray producing the greatest increase in pollutants. Combined product use resulted in an AQI exceeding 200 and PM2.5 above 200 µg/m³. The HEPA + activated carbon air purifier restored air quality to safe levels within one minute, while the exhaust fan produced only modest improvements over 15 minutes.
conclusionCommon nail and hair care products significantly degrade indoor air quality. Air purifiers with HEPA and activated carbon filters are highly effective in removing harmful airborne compounds and should be routinely used in salons to protect workers and clients from long-term health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.