ArticleCureus2025
Unmasking Hemiplegic Migraine: A Diagnostic Dilemma in the Shadow of Stroke.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rare presentation of a migraine headache is hemiplegic migraine (HM), which can clinically imitate other conditions, including transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebrovascular accident (CVA), with unilateral muscle weakness or hemiplegia, making accurate diagnosis challenging. We present a 41-year-old male patient who was admitted with symptoms of a unilateral occipital headache, expressive aphasia, and right-sided motor weakness on two occasions over six days to two different hospitals. CT with and without contrast, echocardiogram, troponin I, EKG, and MRI results were normal. The patient was seen and discharged by neurology to be treated for headaches as an outpatient with butalbital-acetaminophen-caffeine. A diagnosis of sporadic HM was made after a thorough history by the primary care provider and managed conservatively with verapamil. This case highlights the critical role of primary care in synthesizing clinical information and history to establish an accurate diagnosis, underscoring the need for detailed patient evaluation. Raising awareness of HM as part of the differential diagnosis is vital after ruling out life-threatening conditions through imaging and clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.